Skip to main content

This is what really happened to FTX: A breakdown of the crypto crash

This is what the fallout from the massive FTX failure could be

This past week was another painful reminder that history repeats itself. In just one week, the FTX crypto exchange, founded by Sam Bankman-Fried and valued at more than $30 billion (per CNN), collapsed to $1 billion in just a few days before Bankman-Fried filed for bankruptcy on Friday, November 11. With investors left bereft, holding empty money bags, the cry had all the makings of bank runs that helped to spur the Great Depression almost 100 years prior. The crypto crash was only missing the newsboys on the corner, calling out, “FTX insolvent! Investors busted!”

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Banks are lending institutions. Therefore, they do not hold all depositors’ money in cash at physical locations. When big money begins to be withdrawn from the bank, this loss of assets threatens the solvency of the business. When a bank is rumored to be floundering, depositors panic, and flood into the bank demanding their money. Unable to pay it back, the bank crashes and its clients are left bereft.

Recommended Videos

In 1933, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed the Banking Act of 1933, which (along with other measures) created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, guaranteeing U.S. depositor funds up to $100,000 (today, this number is $250,000). With the incredible downfall of one of the world’s largest and most stable crypto platforms, it looks like the freewheeling crypto market is finally going to be facing federal regulation just as banks almost a century prior.

How did this happen

On November 2, crypto news source Coin Desk sourced a “private financial document” that revealed that over $5 billion of FTX’s sister hedge fund assets, Alameda Research, were unlocked FTT tokens (minted by FTX). The problem with this is that the value of FTX was based upon the solid financial footing of the Alameda hedge fund. Hence, each was propping the other up in what Alan Watts refers to as the classic “double bind” — the snake eating its own tale.

Two days after Coin Desk revealed this contradictory accounting, Changpeng Zhao, CEO of FTX competitor Binance, announced that the platform was selling off $580 million worth of its FTX holdings. Monday, Bankman-Fried posted, “FTX is fine. Assets are fine,” on Twitter. Similar to Elon Musk assuring participants in the burning flames of the social media giant, this reassurance did little to mollify the masses. Similar to a classic bank run, investors demanded their money in such rapid and large droves that FTX could not compensate them (per CNN).

On Tuesday, Zhao, despite Binance’s rivalry with FTX, agreed to bail out the platform. And the following Wednesday, Zhao backed out, announcing that FTX’s fall was beyond its ability to compensate. Thursday, Bankman-Fried and FTX desperately grasped at whatever methods they could to raise enough liquid funds to pay its investors. And on Friday, unable to coax any institution onto the sinking ship, FTX filed for bankruptcy.

The fallout

Facing an $8 billion shortfall that includes individual investors, venture capital firms like Silicon Valley’s Sequoia Capital and Lightspeed Venture Partners, and government institutions like the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, bankruptcy proceedings are likely to play out over months, even years. The sad fact is that most of these people and organizations will never see another dime of the money that they considered a safe investment.

This raises questions about crypto’s opaque nature and will almost certainly bring about great changes and regulation after its greatest crash. Bankman-Fried, whose fortune dropped from $15 billion to under $1 billion in just three days (per CNN), is also very likely to face a litany of charges after the Securities and Exchange Commission conducts its investigation. The very small group of executives charged with overseeing FTX and Alameda will also be under intense scrutiny in the coming weeks. In the process, former customers and investors will likely file suit. How they will recover the magic money that’s disappeared from financial statements (but never truly existed in a physical form) is a question that may never be answered.

Matthew Denis
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Matt Denis is an on-the-go remote multimedia reporter, exploring arts, culture, and the existential in the Pacific Northwest…
What do the SAG and DGA nominations mean for the Oscars?
'Wicked' led the SAG nominations, but was snubbed by the DGAs
Ralph Fiennes in Conclave.

Two of the most high-profile awards bodies in Oscars season unveiled their nominees today, giving us a firmer sense of which movies are likely to become Oscar frontrunners. The Screen Actors Guild (SAG) Awards are an actor-oriented ceremony, but their membership has major overlap with the Academy. The Directors Guild Awards (DGAs), meanwhile, give us a sense of which directors might wind up nominated for Best Director.

The SAG nominations turned out to be particularly good for Wicked, which received nominations for three of its actors and its ensemble and its stunt performers for a total of five nominations. A Complete Unknown was just behind it with four, including an ensemble nod and three acting nods, and Anora, Conclave, and Emilia Perez rounded out the best ensemble lineup.

Read more
What do the 2025 Golden Globe results mean for the Oscars?
The Golden Globes have chosen their winners, and picked a pretty surprising slate
Selena Gomez in Emilia Perez

The Golden Globes have traditionally been the kick-off for each year's Oscar season, and 2025 is looking to be no different. The awards ceremony awarded its top honors to Emilia Perez and The Brutalist, but also spread some love around to A Real Pain and Conclave, leaving many wondering what these results might portend for the Oscars themselves.

While the Globes traditionally serve as a launch point for awards season, they have not always been predictive of who would get nominated or win at the Oscars. The membership of the Golden Globes is composed of several hundred foreign journalists and has no overlap with Academy membership, which is thousands of people who work in the industry.

Read more
What we know about Robert De Niro’s Zero Day Netflix series so far
Zero Day is a political thriller series, but it's unclear what it's actually about
Robert De Niro on the red carpet at a Comedy Central roast.

TV's golden era may be behind us, but that doesn't mean that there isn't plenty of interesting stuff coming down the pike on the small screen. One remnant from TV's golden era, though, is the idea that movie stars can jump back and forth between TV and film without hurting their reputations, and what better evidence is there of that than the fact that Robert De Niro is about to star in his first-ever TV series. De Niro may not be as relevant as he was when winning two Academy Awards for The Godfather Part II and Raging Bull, but the iconic Hollywood figure is synonymous with quality storytelling.

Zero Day follows De Niro as a former president named George Mullen who comes out of retirement to "lead a commission tasked with investigating a potential world crisis," according to Netflix. Here's everything we know about the Zero Day Netflix series.
What is Zero Day actually about?
The plot specifics for Zero Day are still a little bit up in the air, but we do have a logline that really asks more questions than it answers:

Read more