Skip to main content

The Manual may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site.

Study: Colonoscopies might not be all that necessary after all

Why a colonoscopy might not be as important as you think, according to one study

Are you due for a colonoscopy and dreading it? A new study indicates you may not need to book one this year.

The study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, concluded that the procedure only reduced the risk of developing colorectal cancer by 18% and did not significantly lower the risk of death from cancer.

Recommended Videos

The first-of-its-kind study called into question what had previously been considered a procedure middle-aged adults needed once every 10 years to check for and potentially reduce the risk of getting colorectal cancer in the first place. The findings may come as welcome news to people who found the colonoscopy procedure invasive.

a male doctor talking to a male patient
Mart Production / Pexels

What is a colonoscopy? For the unfamiliar, the procedure involves having a camera run the entire length of your large intestine, invasively.

Colorectal cancer, a disease in the colon or rectum, will cause more than 52,000 deaths in 2022, according to an estimate by the American Cancer society. It is the second-leading cause of cancer deaths in the U.S.

Numbers like that are scary, but effective screening, treatment, and prevention methods are critical. However, once-a-decade colonoscopies may not fit that bill. The study, which included more than 84,000 participants ages 55 to 64 from Poland, Norway, and Sweden, was the first on record to compare colposcopies to no cancer screening in a head-to-head randomized trial.

The results refute research from 2016 that indicated that colonoscopies could significantly reduce diagnosis and fatality from colon cancer.

arms of doctor with red stethoscope
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Dr. Michael Bretthauer, a gastroenterologist and leader of the clinical effectiveness group at the University of Oslo in Norway, is encouraging people to embrace it. “We may have oversold the message for the last 10 years or so, and we have to wind it back a little,” he said, according to a CNN report.

That said, other experts applauded the study but advised people to interpret the results with caution, in part because less than half of the invited participants (42%) got a colonoscopy.

When study authors filtered results by the number of individuals who went for the procedure (12,000 of the 28,000 invited to get one), the procedure reduced colon cancer risk by 31% and death from the disease by 50%.

Currently, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF), an objective group that guides physician recommendations, suggests people 50 to 75 get tested for colon cancer using one of three options:

1. A colonoscopy procedure every 10 years

2. Stool testing each year

3. Sigmoidoscopy, another evaluation of the colon that is not as comprehensive as the colonoscopy, every five years, plus stool tests every two to three years

At this time, the USPSTF has not announced plans to re-evaluate these recommendations.

BethAnn Mayer
Beth Ann's work has appeared on healthline.com and parents.com. In her spare time, you can find her running (either marathons…
43 minutes vs. 13: Researchers reveal ultra-efficient weightlifting in new study
man with barbell squat weightlifting resistance training

Do you need to spend an hour in the gym to see results? Can multiple shorter sessions throughout the week provide the same or similar strength gains as longer routines if you apply the same effort? These are the questions researchers set out to answer and understand in more depth in an interesting study.

I often remind myself that any amount of exercise is better than none, and my body will thank me for dedicating time to working out. When it comes to building strength with resistance training, many people feel that to get closer to your strength goals you have to push yourself through 40 minutes or longer every time you pick up those weights, but this new study spins that questionable notion on its head.

Read more
Should you take electrolytes before or after your workout? What science says
How much does timing really matter with your electrolyte intake?
Man in gym taking supplement drinking protein shake powder electrolyte mineral

As certain forms of exercise, like running and hybrid training, are gaining popularity, the topic of electrolytes has become a concern for many active people. Nutrition has always been a primary focus for those who work out, but people are starting to realize that they need to focus on more than just their protein goals. As a fitness enthusiast, I have also started to turn my attention to electrolytes as my outdoor runs leave me feeling fatigued.

So, you know you probably should be taking electrolytes, but is it better to take electrolytes before or after workout sessions? Keep reading to find out!

Read more
Can this spice in your kitchen boost muscle recovery post-workout? New study
This vibrant golden spice has been used medicinally in traditional Indian Ayurveda medicine
turmeric spice on spoon

For millennia, herbs have been foraged from the earth and used medicinally. Researchers have been studying the benefits of a broad range of herbs and spices, some of which you might have in your kitchen, sitting politely on the spice rack. Curcumin is the active compound found in turmeric — the golden spice from the ginger family native to Southeast Asia, with a long history in Indian Ayurveda medicine.

The anti-inflammatory power of curcumin

Read more