Skip to main content

The Manual may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site.

Study: Colonoscopies might not be all that necessary after all

Why a colonoscopy might not be as important as you think, according to one study

Are you due for a colonoscopy and dreading it? A new study indicates you may not need to book one this year.

The study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, concluded that the procedure only reduced the risk of developing colorectal cancer by 18% and did not significantly lower the risk of death from cancer.

Recommended Videos

The first-of-its-kind study called into question what had previously been considered a procedure middle-aged adults needed once every 10 years to check for and potentially reduce the risk of getting colorectal cancer in the first place. The findings may come as welcome news to people who found the colonoscopy procedure invasive.

a male doctor talking to a male patient
Mart Production / Pexels

What is a colonoscopy? For the unfamiliar, the procedure involves having a camera run the entire length of your large intestine, invasively.

Colorectal cancer, a disease in the colon or rectum, will cause more than 52,000 deaths in 2022, according to an estimate by the American Cancer society. It is the second-leading cause of cancer deaths in the U.S.

Numbers like that are scary, but effective screening, treatment, and prevention methods are critical. However, once-a-decade colonoscopies may not fit that bill. The study, which included more than 84,000 participants ages 55 to 64 from Poland, Norway, and Sweden, was the first on record to compare colposcopies to no cancer screening in a head-to-head randomized trial.

The results refute research from 2016 that indicated that colonoscopies could significantly reduce diagnosis and fatality from colon cancer.

arms of doctor with red stethoscope
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Dr. Michael Bretthauer, a gastroenterologist and leader of the clinical effectiveness group at the University of Oslo in Norway, is encouraging people to embrace it. “We may have oversold the message for the last 10 years or so, and we have to wind it back a little,” he said, according to a CNN report.

That said, other experts applauded the study but advised people to interpret the results with caution, in part because less than half of the invited participants (42%) got a colonoscopy.

When study authors filtered results by the number of individuals who went for the procedure (12,000 of the 28,000 invited to get one), the procedure reduced colon cancer risk by 31% and death from the disease by 50%.

Currently, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF), an objective group that guides physician recommendations, suggests people 50 to 75 get tested for colon cancer using one of three options:

1. A colonoscopy procedure every 10 years

2. Stool testing each year

3. Sigmoidoscopy, another evaluation of the colon that is not as comprehensive as the colonoscopy, every five years, plus stool tests every two to three years

At this time, the USPSTF has not announced plans to re-evaluate these recommendations.

BethAnn Mayer
Beth Ann's work has appeared on healthline.com and parents.com. In her spare time, you can find her running (either marathons…
How accurate is your Apple Watch fitness tracker? Interesting new study explores
Is your nifty little Apple Watch telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
man sitting checking Apple Watch fitness tracker

Fitness trackers are everywhere these days on iPhones and watches. Fitness enthusiasts and those trying to achieve their goals use these trackers to count steps, track workouts, and measure calories. With so many people depending on them for reliable data, it raises the question: How accurate are those wearables? Are we really getting the correct data on our calories, heart rates, step counts, and more?

In a study published in the European Journal of Applied Physiology, the researchers note that wearable technology has been named the number one most popular trend, and this popularity is predicted to continue growing. Despite their merits and benefits, the researchers also highlight the significant limitations associated with the validity and reliability of the metrics measured from these devices. As they rightly say, advanced marketing doesn’t always equate to advanced technology. 

Read more
All you need is 30 minutes and a pair of dumbbells for Arnie’s Pump Club workout
Grab your dumbbells and get ready to pump iron like the legendary bodybuilder.
Man lifting dumbbells overhead

Arnie is known for his impressive strength and muscular physique. Many of us might think we couldn’t possibly work out like Arnie; however, in his Pump Club Newsletter, Arnie shared a refreshingly simple and bite-sized workout for us to try. The best part is you only need 30 minutes and a pair of dumbbells to pump iron like the renowned bodybuilder himself, which is excellent news for those of us with busy schedules. The champion bodybuilder doesn’t want this workout to get complicated with switching machines, weights, and equipment; just grab your dumbbells.

Arnie’s 30-minute workout 

Read more
What is the best food for muscle recovery? Here’s what to eat after training
Chicken, salmon, and more
Man showing muscles, eating healthy vegetarian salad

When it comes to building muscle, the work you put in at the gym usually gets the most attention. While finishing your training with a pump feels rewarding, it is the nutrition that follows that really determines how much progress you make. As a trainer and nutritionist, I have seen many people give the gym 100% but then neglect their nutrition and wonder why they are never hitting their goals. This is where the best food for muscle recovery comes in.

If you are looking to optimize your muscle-building routine, keep reading to discover the key foods you need to include in your weekly meal plan!

Read more