Skip to main content

The Manual may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site.

Study: Colonoscopies might not be all that necessary after all

Why a colonoscopy might not be as important as you think, according to one study

Are you due for a colonoscopy and dreading it? A new study indicates you may not need to book one this year.

The study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, concluded that the procedure only reduced the risk of developing colorectal cancer by 18% and did not significantly lower the risk of death from cancer.

Recommended Videos

The first-of-its-kind study called into question what had previously been considered a procedure middle-aged adults needed once every 10 years to check for and potentially reduce the risk of getting colorectal cancer in the first place. The findings may come as welcome news to people who found the colonoscopy procedure invasive.

a male doctor talking to a male patient
Mart Production / Pexels

What is a colonoscopy? For the unfamiliar, the procedure involves having a camera run the entire length of your large intestine, invasively.

Colorectal cancer, a disease in the colon or rectum, will cause more than 52,000 deaths in 2022, according to an estimate by the American Cancer society. It is the second-leading cause of cancer deaths in the U.S.

Numbers like that are scary, but effective screening, treatment, and prevention methods are critical. However, once-a-decade colonoscopies may not fit that bill. The study, which included more than 84,000 participants ages 55 to 64 from Poland, Norway, and Sweden, was the first on record to compare colposcopies to no cancer screening in a head-to-head randomized trial.

The results refute research from 2016 that indicated that colonoscopies could significantly reduce diagnosis and fatality from colon cancer.

arms of doctor with red stethoscope
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Dr. Michael Bretthauer, a gastroenterologist and leader of the clinical effectiveness group at the University of Oslo in Norway, is encouraging people to embrace it. “We may have oversold the message for the last 10 years or so, and we have to wind it back a little,” he said, according to a CNN report.

That said, other experts applauded the study but advised people to interpret the results with caution, in part because less than half of the invited participants (42%) got a colonoscopy.

When study authors filtered results by the number of individuals who went for the procedure (12,000 of the 28,000 invited to get one), the procedure reduced colon cancer risk by 31% and death from the disease by 50%.

Currently, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF), an objective group that guides physician recommendations, suggests people 50 to 75 get tested for colon cancer using one of three options:

1. A colonoscopy procedure every 10 years

2. Stool testing each year

3. Sigmoidoscopy, another evaluation of the colon that is not as comprehensive as the colonoscopy, every five years, plus stool tests every two to three years

At this time, the USPSTF has not announced plans to re-evaluate these recommendations.

BethAnn Mayer
Beth Ann's work has appeared on healthline.com and parents.com. In her spare time, you can find her running (either marathons…
Surprising study finds this type of walking is better for your heart than HIIT
It's time to grab those poles and set off on foot for your heart health.
man with hiking poles nordic walking

Exercise in general has been proven beneficial for your heart health, from reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease to lowering blood pressure and inflammation. You don’t have to spend hours exhausting yourself at the gym or running marathons to see these heart benefits.

Previous research shows that walking at an average pace of around three to four miles per hour lowered the likelihood of a heart arrhythmia by one-third and resulted in a 35% reduced risk of heart rhythm abnormalities. Walking at a pace faster than four miles per hour slashed that risk by 43% as well as lowering the levels of inflammation. Taking a brisk walk around the block is also advantageous for your heart.

Read more
Why I always feel better after a forest walk—and the science backs it up
Turn your weekend stroll into a wellness boost
Man walking through sunlit trees

As both a nature and health enthusiast, I love going for outdoor walks when the weather allows, as I find it to be calming and a great way to get some extra steps in. You may feel the same way and have frequently gone for walks just for the sake of enjoyment, but did you know that there are actual health benefits of forest walking?

The next time you are on the fence when deciding whether to take that stroll through the woods, keep in mind these three surprising health benefits that you could be missing out on. Let’s dive in!

Read more
Just five minutes of brisk walking can boost brain power, study finds
You'd be surprised by how little time it takes for exercise to help sharpen your brain...even just a brisk walk around the block
two men walking around the block

I find that the days when I really don’t feel like walking around the block and taking my dogs are the days when I really need it the most. Scientists have found that a brief 10-minute brisk walk and meditation improved mood, and adults who managed around 2.5 hours of brisk walking per week lowered their risk of depression by 25%.

Walking provides physical and mental health benefits, even if you only have time for 10 minutes. In another interesting study, researchers revealed just how little time it takes to get those brain benefits and boost cognition, even for older adults.

Read more