Skip to main content

This is what minimum wage should actually be (Hint: We’re being screwed over)

What Is Minimum Wage? Researchers Say It Needs to Consider More Basic Necessities

Although the federal minimum wage rate — the minimum employers are allowed to pay employees per hour — is not set in stone, it has not increased since 2009. The Fair Labor Standards Act sets the minimum wage and the U.S. Department of Labor enforces it. So, what is the minimum wage? Currently, $7.25 per hour (though it may be higher in your city or state).

At 40 hours per week, minus about 30% in taxes, that’s about $200 per week. According to research, rent in the U.S. reached an all-time median high in April 2022, topping out at over $1,800 per month. This is, of course, a broad swathe, but simple math shows that working full-time at minimum wage is not tenable. Especially considering significant inflation to essential commodities in just the past few months.

Crumpled money with Minimum wage text.
Marco Verch

In response, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge recently took a deep dive on the Living Wage Calculator first created in 2004 by Dr. Amy K. Glasmeier. Each year since, Glasmeier has worked with colleagues to tweak the formula to increase its accuracy. The calculator’s purpose is to reexamine the standard of living conditions beyond the poverty threshold that federal policymakers often use to determine social aid. MIT takes poverty levels a step further to include “what many consider to be basic necessities enjoyed by many Americans.” What MIT asks is: how much do individuals and families need to make to support themselves? The answer is the university’s living wage model.

“The living wage model is an alternative measure of basic needs. It is a market-based approach that draws upon geographically specific expenditure data related to a family’s likely minimum food, childcare, health insurance, housing, transportation, and other basic necessities (e.g. clothing, personal care items, etc.) costs,” MIT states in describing “About” the model.

This is a perspective beyond the poverty threshold level to see how people can get ahead instead of treading water.

“The living wage draws on… cost elements and the rough effects of income and payroll taxes to determine the minimum employment earnings necessary to meet a family’s basic needs while also maintaining self-sufficiency,” the description continues.

Minimum wage is the legislated point that U.S. society won’t let families slip under. When this fails to provide living wages, working adults must seek public assistance and/or hold multiple jobs to pay for food, shelter, clothing, grooming, health care, transportation, and additional multitudinous functional needs. The calculator accounts for the ability to endure beyond simple existence to planning and saving for potential hardships from unexpected medical and child care bills.

The beauty of establishing a livable income for families, MIT posits, is that fulfilling beyond very basic needs “would enable the working poor to achieve financial independence while maintaining housing and food security. When coupled with lowered expenses for childcare and housing, the living wage might also free up resources for savings, investment, and the purchase of capital assets (e.g., provisions for retirement or home purchases) that build wealth and ensure long-term financial stability and security.”

There’s a variety of critical financial plans to consider beyond today. For anyone who has lived check to check out there, it’s obvious the amount of stress that figures into uncertainty concerning food, shelter, clothing, and other vital needs.

As calculated in December 2021 and reflecting individual compensation in 2022, the living wage calculator found, that on average, the living wage in this country is $24.16 per hour, or $100,498.60 per year before taxes for a family of four with two working adults and two children. This compares to $21.54, and $89,605.51 in 2020, an almost 11% jump.

Zooming in, cost of living varies a good deal from place to place. Families in the North and West have higher average costs of living and therefore require higher living wages than families in the South and Midwest. MIT graphics show an incredible differential between how much people earn (and must earn) in different U.S. cities. In the McAllen-Edinburg-Mission tri-cities area in southern Texas, families average only about $81,000 annual income whereas in Silicon Valley, the average is almost $150,000, nearly double what low-wage workers on the Mexican border are making, on average.

Unfortunately for those on the low end, poverty hits the hard up most potently.

“A single mother with two children earning the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour needs to work 235 hours per week, the equivalent of almost six full-time minimum-wage jobs, to make a living wage,” MIT states.

What’s not as well-known is that state minimum wages vary across the country as does how far the money actually goes. According to MIT, the minimum wage covers, at best, 59.8% of the living wage for two-adult, two-child families in Washington. At worst? Wisconsin, which accounts for a whopping 30% below the living wage, leaving thousands unable to cover basic needs.

What’s to be done? Well, it’s not difficult for federal and state governments and even localities to raise the minimum wage. Some places now even provide a living wage. Stockton, California, and the state of Alaska started the trend, but now places like Pittsburgh, Chicago, New Orleans, and New York all have some sort of basic universal income. The results of helping to lift people out of indentured servitude will be trickling out over the next few months and years.

Keep an eye on The Manual for developments to MIT’s Living Wage Calculator and other basic income initiatives. Glasmeier wrote in a 2022 update, for example, that the Cambridge university will be tracking inflation over the coming month in comparison to the change in the national CPI and make adjustments to the tool accordingly.

Learn More

Editors' Recommendations

Matthew Denis
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Matt Denis is an on-the-go remote multimedia reporter, exploring arts, culture, and the existential in the Pacific Northwest…
Why we’re beyond excited for HBO Max’s Dune: The Sisterhood
What we know about Dune: The Sisterhood on HBO Max (so far)
dune the sisterhood prequel news los angeles  jan 08 indira varma arrives for

 We’re one step closer to the Dune prequel, and there’s some serious casting news to share. Emily Watson (Chernobyl, God’s Creatures) and Shirley Henderson (Harry Potter, Stan & Ollie) will be the leading ladies on Dune: The Sisterhood. And, according to Deadline, they'll be joined by Indira Varma, best known for her work in Game Of Thrones, Obi-Wan and Carnival Row.
The show, ordered as a series by HBO Max in 2019, takes viewers back 10,000 years prior to the ascension of Paul Atreides, the protagonist of the first two novels in the Dune series written by Frank Herbert in the 1960s.

Watson is slated to take on the role of Valya Harkonnen, while Henderson will portray Tula Harkonnen. The sisters have risen in the ranks of a secret organization of women known as the Dune Sisterhood. The series will follow them as they take on forces threatening to take down humankind.
Watson has received two Oscar nominations for Best Actress. The first came for her role in Breaking the Waves (1996), and the second honored her work in Hilary and Jackie (1998). She received an Emmy nomination for supporting actress in Chernobyl.
Henderson is widely known for her role as Moaning Myrtle in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. She also appeared in the Bridget Jones franchise.
For her part, Varma will play Empress Natalya, a character who united worlds when she married Emperor Corrino and who is described as "formidable." (We have no doubt.)
Of course, they won’t be the only names in the credit. Creator Diane Ademu-John, whose credits include The Haunting of Bly Manor (2020) and Empire (2015) will act as an executive producer, co-showrunner, and executive produce.
Johan Renck, who won a pair of Emmys for his roles as executive producer and director on Chernobyl, has been tapped to direct the premiere episode of Dune: The Sisterhood. It’s unclear when that will air, but we do know Denis Villeneuve, who directed, co-wrote, and produced last year’s Dune flick, will be another executive producer. Other executive producers include Jon Spaihts, Scott Z. Burns, Matthew King, John Cameron, Cait Collins, and author Brian Herbert.
With a cast and crew of this caliber shaping up, we're more than ready for a night of binge-watching.
The 2021 film adaptation of Dune scored 10 nominations at the 94th Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Screenplay. The movie took home the most hardware, winning  Best Sound, Best Original Score, Best Film Editing, Best Production Design, Best Visual Effects, and Best Cinematography. A sequel is set for November 2023. For now, we’ll wait on bated breath for more news on the Dune prequel series on HBO Max, which seems to be banking on prequels lately (See: House of Dragon).

Read more
The 11 Best Gifts for Your Wife We’re Sure She’ll Enjoy
A husband surprising his wife with a gift at home.

The holiday gifting dynamic between husband and wife can be complex. Some couples try to outdo one another in some sort of passive-aggressive competition to show who loves the other more. Some partners enjoy minimalist holidays and put restrictions on the quantity and price of the gifts they give. However, many marriages are comprised of one partner that is great at giving thoughtful, heartfelt gifts, while the other is not as great and winds up buying a bunch of last-minute Starbucks gift cards.

Historically, the burden of poor gift ideas has fallen to the husband. But, no longer! The Manual is here with excellent gift suggestions that will keep you out of the dog house. Whether you only need one great gift, or all 11, these will all do the trick.

Read more
Walmart has a 75-inch 4K TV for less than $500 (seriously)
The Onn. 75-inch Frameless 4K TV on a white background.

If you love to watch sports regularly, you need a suitably large TV to truly enjoy everything that's unfolding in front of your eyes. That's why we're excited to see Walmart offering an Onn. 75-inch Frameless 4K TV for $498 for a limited time only. Usually priced at $578, you're saving $80 off the regular price making this a pretty sweet deal. If you need to know more about the TV, keep reading. If you're already sold you can simply tap the buy button below to get straight to making a purchase.

Why you should buy the Onn. 75-inch Frameless 4K TV
One of the best ways to watch live sports online is through a smart TV with a massive screen. That's easily the case with the Onn. 75-inch Frameless 4K TV. It has a truly vast 75-inch panel which means you should double-check check your living space has enough room to fully accommodate it. If you're keen to have a TV take up much of the room though, this is a seriously cheap bargain.

Read more