Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Auto

BMW’s In-Car Subscription Feature Is a No-Good, Terrible Idea

Joel Patel
By

For years, German automakers have offered consumers pages and pages of available options. Whether you want carbon fiber trim, red seatbelts, or different colored gauges, German brands will sell them to you for a hefty price. When it comes to regular features, like heated seats and smartphone compatibility, the majority of German automakers lock these behind expensive packages or pricey à la carte structures. It’s an annoying practice, but BMW’s latest in-car subscription service takes all of the worst qualities of its “everything is extra” system and multiples it by 1,000.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Recently, BMW caught a lot of flak for introducing an annual fee of $80 for owners to use Apple CarPlay. While nearly every other automaker in the industry offers Apple CarPlay as a standard feature or at least an upgradeable one with a one-time payment as part of a package, BMW thought it was a good idea to charge owners a yearly fee, because it thought some owners may not need the feature and wouldn’t want to pay for it with the initial purchase of the vehicle. Don’t be fooled; it was a money grab. The automaker eventually went back on the decision, but clearly hasn’t learned from it, because it recently introduced an even more heinous pricing model that would screw consumers over.

Recommended Videos

Earlier this month, BMW announced that it would be upgrading its latest iDrive 7.0 system. The wireless upgrade isn’t the culprit and it’s certainly nothing to be upset about. It brings quite a few things like wireless Android Auto support, upgraded BMW Maps, and a new version of BMW Intelligent Personal Assistant. The real knife in the back that every consumer should see as Armageddon is the expansion of BMW ConnectedDrive.

Related

BMW, in its own words, “sees the car as a digital platform.” And like a digital device, say like your laptop, BMW sees the future of car ownership as the automaker selling pricey, luxury vehicles to consumers and then requiring them to pay a subscription fee to unlock additional features. Just because your Macbook Pro can run Microsoft Office doesn’t mean it comes with it out of the box. You have to pay for it, just like you do with Photoshop, Final Cut Pro X, or any other application you use. BMW wants to do the same thing, but for car features.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

In its press release, BMW specifically calls out high-beam assist, adaptive cruise control, BMW’s IconicSounds Sport (fake noises being pumped into the cabin), BMW Drive Recorder (a high-tech dash cam), and Adaptive M Suspension as features that could become available for purchase as part of a subscription plan in the future. While the automaker hasn’t laid out the way it will work, some features will be available through a monthly subscription fee, while others will be an expensive one-time purchase. Heated seats, for instance, will probably be a subscription thing. In the winter months, you’ll be charged a certain amount to be able to use the feature in your vehicle. In the summer, you don’t have to pay for it if you don’t want to, unless you like throwing money directly into the trash. For things like high-beam assist and adaptive cruise control, we’re sure those are more of a one-time purchase thing.

There are two ways to look at this. From one side, it does offer consumers flexibility. If you don’t want adaptive cruise control or high-beam assist, why pay for them? It means you’ll get a relatively low starting price on a shiny new BMW and can then add any features you want after the purchase. It’s a way to build the perfect car. If you happen to sell the car, the second owner can either choose to continue to pay the subscription prices for the features you chose or simply stop paying for them.

The way the system does things, if I’m being honest, is pretty cool. BMW put out a short clip of someone wanting to purchase high-beam assist. The driver is traveling on a windy, dark road and realizes that he needs high-beam assist at that exact moment. So, he pulls over, scrolls through BMW ConnectedDrive on the touchscreen, and purchases High Beam Assistant for $198 (€176). That’s it! All you have to do is wait five minutes, turn the car off and on again, and the feature’s on your car. It’s genuinely cool.

BMW ConnectedDrive. Add vehicle functions to your BMW over the air.

But on the face of it, this is such a sleazy way of doing business. If other automakers, especially ones outside of the luxury realm, are giving consumers all of these features as standard equipment, why would you ever buy a BMW? No, seriously. BMW’s cars aren’t cheap. The cheapest vehicle starts at around $35,000 and at that price, it’s almost inexcusable to charge consumers fees to get features that are already built into the vehicle. That’s the part that really irks me. In the future, BMW will knowingly build all of its vehicles with the same hardware, they’ve just told the computers not to switch the software on without some extra money.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

For BMW, this is an easy way to make some coin. An annual fee or a charge of a set amount of money after the initial purchase raises its profits. It also means BMW can make even more money on the used market. Beyond that, it’s going to cause a lot of mayhem for used car shoppers, as having to figure out what features are currently being subscribed to, how much the initial purchase cost, and the date of when the pay-to-use features will end is going to be a nightmare.

We should point out that this is just in the works and BMW is still deciding whether it will actually introduce the program. But the fact that the company put out an official press release, made a video on how it works, and showcased the tech during a VR press event for some outlets makes us think that there’s a high possibility that it will be introduced.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

This is truly an absurd idea. If consumers, shoppers, and anyone remotely interested in vehicles doesn’t yell at BMW for this, it could change the way cars are bought forever. Automakers follow one another; if one comes out with a program that works and makes money, it spreads quicker than the common cold. Wanting to change things to draw consumers in or introducing innovative ways to give consumers features is one thing, going out of your way to screw shoppers over while making them think that they’re getting more flexibility, though, is insane.

Editors' Recommendations

Joel Patel
Joel Patel
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Joel Patel is a former contributor for The Manual. His work has also been featured on Autoweek, Digital Trends, Autoblog…
Report: The car colors with the best (and worst) resale value
Believe it or not, the color of your car can greatly affect its resale value
Colorful supercars parked

Anyone who has ever bought a car or even dreamed of buying one always starts with the same few options. First is what type of car they want, then what brand and model they want, and finally, what car colors are available and which of those suits them the best. It may seem self-evident that color choice is almost always based on personal preference, but what if there was another reason to choose the color of that car? A new report from iSeeCars.com proves that color choice directly affects the resale value of vehicles, and you might be surprised at the results.
Yellow cars win the resale gold
After evaluating more than 1.3 million used cars, all three years old, the color that held its value better than all others? Yellow. That’s right, eye-catching yellow cars depreciated just 13.5% of their value after three years, equating to an average of $6,588 lower than their original MSRP. At the other end of the spectrum is gold, which drops precipitously over the same time frame, nearly doubling yellow’s numbers, falling 25.9% and an average of $11,546.
Sedans and minivans are worth more in boring colors
However, the ranks change when you delve into specific vehicle types. In the sedan category, surprisingly, brown is the leader in the clubhouse, depreciating just 16.8% and $5,292 after three years, while not-so-surprisingly, purple falls the hardest at 24.6% and $7,265. Sedans are family haulers and aren’t designed to be overly flashy. This may explain why a more traditional color tops the list than the vivid and polarizing purple at the bottom.

In the niche market of off-road trucks, beige tops the list, dropping a mere 7.9% and just $3,640, as compared to silver, which at the bottom of the list depreciates 16.5% and a full $8,042. This may be because newer, more hardcore off-roaders like the Toyota Tacoma TRD, Ram TRX Sandblast Edition, and Jeep Gladiator Mojave are all low-volume specialty vehicles that are some of the few offered in beige but retain their value in most any color.

Read more
Bad buys: These 10 cars have the worst resale values
Used car values: Stay away from these 10 models
2023 BMW 7-Series parked on the side of the road in front of mountains.

The pandemic caused used car prices to go haywire. Everyone wanted to buy a car, but new ones weren't available, so they went to the used car markets. High demand resulted in high prices and chaos. While finding a new car at a dealership without a massive markup is still difficult, you'll want to pay extra close attention to car value and what car you buy while asking yourself -- what is my car worth? -- because depreciation could be on your side or against you.

These ten cars have the worst resale values
iSeeCars analyzed over three million three-year-old and five-year-old used cars sold in 2022 to find which vehicles hold onto their values and which ones depreciate like rocks. Because of the pandemic, used vehicles retained their resale value more than before. But quite a few used cars had depreciation figures that crossed over 50%, well above the national average of 33%.
So, if you're looking to avoid a vehicle with a horrible resale value, you'll want to stay far away from these ten models:

Read more
The 9 best sports cars under $100k you can get
Six figures may not get you as much as it used to, but you can get one of these sports cars with that budget
2022 Jaguar F-Type front end angle from passenger's side parked on the side of a street with a glass building in the background.

Blame inflation, supply chain issues, or global issues that won't go away, but cars are way, way, way more expensive than they used to be. Unfortunately, inflated auto prices are a new trend that doesn't seem like it will be slowing down anytime soon. Despite this, if you're lucky enough to have $100,000 to spend on a high-performance sports car, you have some great sports cars under $100k to explore.
Are sports cars affordable? Yea right? While one wouldn't normally consider $100,000 sports cars affordable, shoppers who have some money to blow can find homegrown American muscle cars like the Dodge Challenger or exotics like the Lotus Emira on this budget. So, if you're seeking a sports car in this price range, from mega-powered muscle cars to mid-engine sports cars, here are the nine best sports cars under $100k.

Porsche 718 Cayman GTS 4.0 - $88,750
Unbelievably, $100,000 isn't enough to get into a base Porsche 911 anymore, but Porsche's loss is your gain because you can get a 718 Cayman GTS 4.0 for that money. The GTS 4.0 has the same flat-six engine found in the track-ready GT4. In this sports car, the 4.0-liter six-cylinder makes 300 horsepower and revs all the way to 7,000 rpm. Additionally, the motor is an ode to natural aspiration with rapid response time and a pure sound. 
Like other Porsches, what makes the GTS 4.0 so special is the way it handles and feels like a complete package. Shifts are excellent, handling is sublime, and the car feels like it can take beating after beating without an issue. So, whether you spend time on the track or the road, the GTS 4.0 feels special in either environment.  

Read more