Skip to main content

No more pay-per-view? UFC signs exclusive streaming deal with Paramount

The deal will start in 2026 and run through 2032.

The UFC Championship belt.
UFC

Under a new deal announced on Monday, Paramount will become the exclusive streaming home for UFC events for the next seven years in the US. The deal, which Paramount reached with TKO Group, has an average annual value of $1.1 billion, according to the companies.

Under the terms of the deal, Paramount will stream UFC’s full slate of its 13 marquee numbered events and 30 “Fight Nights” on its streaming platform, Paramount+, with some events also being simulcast on CBS, starting in 2026.

Recommended Videos

“This deal puts UFC amongst the biggest sports in the world,” UFC CEO Dana White wrote in a post on X. “The exposure provided by the Paramount and CBS networks under this new structure is a huge win for our athletes and anyone who watches and loves this sport.”

This streaming deal marks a shift away from UFC’s current pay-per-view model, but one that will allow the MMA programming to reach a newer and broader audience. “Paramount’s advantage lies in the expansive reach of our linear and streaming platforms,” David Ellison, chairman and CEO of Paramount, said in a statement. “Live sports continue to be a cornerstone of our broader strategy — driving engagement, subscriber growth, and long-term loyalty, and the addition of UFC’s year-round must-watch events to our platforms is a major win.”

UFC events are currently available to stream through tiered pricing on ESPN+ thanks to a deal with Disney that lasts through the end of 2025. This new streaming model is sure to open UFC to a broader audience, and it comes just days after Paramount finalized its own sale for $8 billion to Skydance.

Joe Allen
Joe Allen is a freelance culture writer based in upstate New York. His work has been published in The Washington Post, The…
May gems: The best Disney+ shows to stream this month
Disney nostalgia and awesome new shows to stream
The Mandalorian looks out over the sun

Disney Plus has finally created a competitive library of original series that can compete with other services like Netflix and Max. It's also a treasure trove of Disney nostalgia for anyone who grew up in the '90s and early 2000s. On top of all that, the streamer has released a few of the most popular TV series to come out in recent years, and those series, on top of the deep catalog, make a Disney+ subscription worthwhile.

The streaming service is, at the end of the day, still a streaming service. As a Disney fan myself, though, it can be hard not to get swept up in the magic that the service contains. Disney is an old-fashioned dream factory, and Disney+ is home to many of those dreams.

Read more
Apple is losing over $1 billion a year on streaming, but so what?
The tech giant doesn't need to make money on its streaming venture.
Jennifer Aniston and Reese Witherspoon in The Morning Show.

According to a report from The Information, Apple is losing roughly $1 billion on its streaming content every year. The report suggests that Apple spent roughly $5 billion on streaming in 2019, but has trimmed that number slightly.

The news that Apple is spending more money than it's making on streaming has some wondering if this is a sustainable business model for the company. After all, most corporations want to make money, and right now, Apple TV+ is doing the opposite.

Read more
Streaming subscribers are paying $69/mo. for streaming, and many think that’s too much
The cost is still less than what it costs to pay for cable
Man and woman watching Netflix

The streaming revolution was supposed to usher us into an era when things were cheaper and you could buy more things a la carte. According to Deloitte's 19th annual Digital Media Trends report, though, people are still paying plenty, and they aren't necessarily happy about it.

According to the report, people are paying $69/mo. on average for four streaming services, which is a 13% increase from a year ago. Cable or satellite customers are still paying more, though, with their average cost coming out to $125/mo. 47% of those surveyed said that they are paying too much for those services, and 41% said that they don't believe the price they pay is worth it for the content available on these platforms, whic his up 5% from the last report.

Read more