Skip to main content

Major League Baseball Lockout: the Issues and Possibility of Resolution

The 1959 MLB World Series at the L.A. Coliseum.
ievenlostmycat/Wikipedia

MLB’s collective bargaining agreement expired at 11:59 p.m. ET on Dec. 1, marking the first time since 1994 that the deadline passed without a new agreement. Baseball owners ‘locked out’ the players, meaning that all transactions are frozen until an agreement is reached.

Owner and player demands are not close to aligning, but each side asserts that it wants to make the game more competitive. How to do this is where the issues lie, specifically to solve a growing wealth gap between teams, player contracts, and players under team control. While each party claims that they’re negotiating fairly, each collective is dead set on maintaining their positions. If no agreement is reached by the start of training camp next February, part or all of the 2022 season could be in jeopardy.

Recommended Videos

In a strange olive branch to fans, Major League Baseball commissioner Rob Manfred laid blame for the owners’ lockout at the feet of the game’s players.

“Regrettably, it appears the Players Association came to the bargaining table with a strategy of confrontation over compromise,” Manfred wrote on Dec. 2. “They never wavered from collectively the most extreme set of proposals in their history, including significant cuts to the revenue-sharing system, a weakening of the competitive balance tax, and shortening the period of time that players play for their teams. All of these changes would make our game less competitive, not more.”

That’s intense, Mr. Commish. 

Money has been the main schism between the two parties for decades, maybe since the beginning of the MLB. Points of contention listed by Manfred — raising the luxury tax threshold, revenue-sharing, establishing a minimum collective team salary, and balancing service-time for arbitration — have been stewing since the early 2000s.

What a fair share of the pie might be differs considerably in perspective right now. The two sides tried to hammer out a deal before the Dec. 1 deadline, but the owners reportedly “were not pleased” with the union’s proposal — a 12-team playoff format, a $30 million increase in the team luxury-tax threshold, a larger part of overall revenue, and less owner control over arbitration. 

Where Manfred, in his letter, cites the $1.7 billion committed to free agents in November as evidence that player contracts are on the rise, most of this money was taken up by elite players on enormous deals. After spending was slowed by instituting a hard slotting system for draftees, steep draft-pick penalties for signing free agents, and stiff financial fines for exceeding the luxury tax, players began to see the fortunes gained in free agency decline after the 2011 and 2016 CBAs. Even as MLB revenues rise annually, the average player salary has dropped every year since 2017. Former journeyman MLB centerfielder and union representative Doug Glanville dug into the effect of these evaporating salaries with NPR. 

“There is a middle class that’s disappearing,” Glanville said. “The last collective bargained here five years ago plus. That middle class pool, in terms of the aggregate of their salaries, has gone down significantly.”

Related Guides

In addition, hot prospects can lose a year of free agent, hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars, because of service-time manipulation. From the time players arrive in the pros, their arbitration clocks begin ticking toward year three when an arbitrator decides on an equitable worth between player and team proposals. That is the time players experience a big bump in salary for the first time, but teams have a great deal of control if this will be in year three or year four. 

Former Chicago Cub top prospect, Kris Bryant, for example, a phenom who clearly showed he was ready for the show, spent the first month of his career in the minors, so that 2015 did not count toward this service. Even after spending an April in AAA, Bryant still went on to win the National League Rookie of the Year. Two years later, he missed out on millions of dollars because 2015 didn’t count toward service time. 

Service time is apparently such an important factor for owners that they will only agree to altering time served if the new CBA avoids all other concerns. While Manfred asserts that the owners “worked hard to find compromise while making the system even better for players,” Evan Drellich of The Athletic responded with the following:  

“The owners would not agree to make a counter on reserve system (which determines when players qualify for free agency) and luxury-tax issues unless the MLBPA agreed in advance to drop a number of key demands, including the time it takes players to get to free agency and revenue sharing between owners, a person with knowledge of the union’s position said. Such a precondition was something union leadership could not recall seeing before in bargaining, the person said, and the players did not agree to the request.”

Compromise can be tough, especially if you start out in a stage of denial.

There are several issues at hand integral to player livelihoods as well as to the game’s competitive balance. It’s critical players and owners work this out soon, but neither side is budging.

A January or early February deal would still have a major impact on the offseason landscape. A deal in the next four to six weeks would still delay Winter Meetings, the Rule 5 Draft, and arbitration discussions. Unsigned free agents would have to scramble to get contracts while teams would have to kick into overdrive to commence a normal spring training. 

Spring training is set to begin Feb. 26 and opening day on March 31. Right now, only the best honest efforts from owners and players can assure that this happens. The MLB is very much at risk of losing games due to a labor dispute for the first time since 1995 and alienating more potential fans who will turn away if the games are not played. 

Read More: Why Millionaire Pitcher Daniel Norris Still Lives in His Van

Topics
Matthew Denis
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Matt Denis is an on-the-go remote multimedia reporter, exploring arts, culture, and the existential in the Pacific Northwest…
Everything we know so far about Only Murders in the Building season 5
Yet another homicide has happened at the Arconia in Only Murders in the Building
Steve Martin, Martin Short and Selena Gomez in Only Murders in the Building

Only Murders in the Building season 4 came to a close with one of its most succinct finales in the series. Charles, Oliver, and Mabel solved the murder of Sazz Pataki and brought justice to Jane Lynch's character in an orderly fashion, but there would be no further seasons of this spooky show if the murderous pattern in the Arconia were to end this time. The episode closed with two more mysteries to be solved next season.
Only Murders in the Building has been one of the biggest hits on Hulu since it premiered in 2021. Steve Martin, Selena Gomez, and Martin Short make up one of the most endearing trios ever assembled on TV. Martin and Short have been longtime friends and collaborators, therefore Gomez's addition is what elevated the show into a more dynamic and age-diverse comedy. We're so glad they'll all be back for a fifth go-around. This is everything we know about Only Murders in the Building season 5. 

What will Only Murders in the Building season 5 be about?
It looks like there will be two different murder cases in the fifth season of the show. The main murder storyline revolves around Lester the doorman. At the end of the fourth season finale, the podcasting trio finds Lester's corpse in the fountain outside of the Arconia. Blood has pooled around the outside of the fountain in one of the show's more graphic depictions of violence in four seasons so far. This comes on the heels of a joyous union between Oliver and Loretta. The juxtaposition between happiness and sadness works so well in Only Murders in the Building and allows it to operate as a drama and a dark comedy at the same time.

Read more
Every Mission: Impossible movie, ranked
The series was adapted from a long-running television series from the 1960s
Paula Patton and Tom Cruise in Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol.

The Mission: Impossible franchise is one of the most reliable franchises in modern Hollywood. Spanning more than 20 years and still ongoing, the franchise has produced a number of unbelievable action movies, and, because it's a Paramount franchise, they also represent the most rewatchable movies on Paramount Plus.

Starring Tom Cruise as action hero Ethan Hunt, these movies are always ostensibly about Hunt as an agent of the Impossible Mission Force assigned to save various world calamities. Really, though, this franchise has just become an excuse to watch Cruise do some of the most insane things you've ever seen. The stunts are incredible, but just as remarkable is how consistently great these movies have been. We're ranking the entire franchise from worst to best, but remember that most of these movies are pretty good.

Read more
Discover the 8 best classic movies you can stream on Tubi
These free classics give you an alternative to what's on Netflix

Movie fans are used to searching Netflix, Hulu, Max, and Prime Video for their favorite films. While these services have the most options, the increase in streaming prices has limited the number of options people can afford to choose from. Bundles make it better, but watching movies for free is even better. Look no further than Tubi. This online site has a ton of great, overlooked films in a variety of genres to provide entertainment to the masses without having to pay a subscription.

As older movies get harder to find, Tubi has decided to make it a priority to collect a large library of classics for free. Whether you want to watch a literary adaptation or a comedy flick, all of the pre-21st-century legends are at your fingertips. These are the best classic movies to stream on Tubi.

Read more