A Brief History Of American Populism


OCCUPYThe term “Populism” is hard to pin down. Here’s an example of why that’s so in a nutshell: Remember the Occupy Wall Street movement, and all its many offshoots? These were the folks crowding city streets all around the nation while wearing Guy Fawkes masks, railing against the “1%” and the perceived plutocracy, and camping out for weeks on end.

TEA PARTYThose Occupiers didn’t seem to have much in common with folks from the Tea Party movement, right? The latter were more about the cowboy hats and flags and “Don’t Tread On Me” gear, and they targeted “Big Government” and taxation as the object of their ire. But guess what? Both can accurately be called Populist movements.

The fact is that Populism is a term that can adopted by (or ascribed to) pretty much any group of people — regardless of their political leanings — provided that at the heart of their message is the notion that true political power comes directly from the will of the people. Add to that the notion that said “will” is being suppressed by a (perceived) group of “elites.” So, to put it simply and crassly (yet with lovely alliteration), more often than not, Populists are pissed off people. If you’re picturing something like this:

ORLANDO, FL - MARCH 5: Supporters cheer as republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a campaign event at the CFE Federal Credit Union Arena in Orlando, FL on Saturday March 05, 2016. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Then… you’re right.

But let’s start way back…

One could argue that Julius Caesar was one of political history’s first populist leaders. He used popular anger at the Roman Senate (of which he was a member) to rile up the populace and alter laws through referendums that eventually led to his role of supreme power as Emperor.

Related: Influential Non-Presidents of America

Various Protestant groups used a populist approach to help establish themselves as viable alternatives to the Catholic church following the Reformation set off by Matin Luther in 1517. The new sects appealed to largely powerless peasants who had the most to gain from bucking a system ruled by church and landed elites.

And an ostensibly populist bent informed the leaders of the American Revolutionary War, the French Revolution, and were behind the many revolts that rose and, for the most part, failed across much of Europe in the mid 19th Century. (1848 was a particularly bloody year in terms of populist uprisings suppressed by the ruling establishment.)

When it comes to American populism, you can look to the so-called Robber Barons of the 19th Century as the original inspiration for many of the movements to come. The industrialist juggernauts who came to be known derisively as Robber Barons included names like Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, and Carnegie; these were men who built veritable empires of wealth thanks to their unscrupulous domination of burgeoning industries including steel, oil, and rail roads. Each came to hold not only immense wealth, but also immense power, often to the extreme detriment of the lower classes of Americans, people who were often working for the very men they detested.

BRYANThus it was that in 1891, a new political party emerged: The People’s Party, often referred to as The Populist Party. This new movement was supported by farmers and laborers and was fiercely opposed to the boundless wealth and influence of the handful of powerful industrialists atop the pyramid of power in American society. The Populist Party ran candidates for the presidential election of 1892, then merged with the Democratic Party in 1896, this time fielding William Jennings Bryan, a man who both embraced and embodied the populist sentiments of the era. Bryan was a man who knew how to give a speech. In fact, during the 1896 campaign, he made 500 speeches, ushering in the era of the “Stump Speech” we still know today. Bryan hated big banks, opposed our involvement in foreign wars, and put immense faith in the “common” man and woman. His efforts to break up business monopolies, his opposition to international imperialism, and his tireless support for working people did much to elevate Bryan’s political star, but he still lost in the elections of 1896, 1900, and 1908.

TEDDYFortunately for Bryan, though he was always a bridesmaid when it came to presidential politics, a man named Theodore Roosevelt rose to the highest office when President William McKinley was shot and killed in September of 1901. Roosevelt was a Progressive through and through, a term that, in politics, sees policies that tend to closely align with the desires of left-leaning populists, only with less grassroots anger and demagoguery necessarily involved. The Progressive Era lasted well into the 1920s and saw many large companies broken up and reigned in and much of the corruption endemic to government stamped out. It also ushered in Prohibition, and that was just a lot of rot, but what can you do.

The rest of the 20th Century saw its share of populists on both ends of the political spectrum. On the right, men like Joseph McCarthy and George Wallace both used appeals to the fears and angers of many “everyday” Americans to push their agendas (which were essentially anti-communism and bigotry, respectively), and with Huey Long and Ralph Nader as two of that century’s better-known populist politicians, and with none other than Bernie Sanders as a more recent left-leaning populist.

TRIMPBut if you want to understand why populism is such a powerful — and potentially dangerous — force, look no farther than the campaign of one Donald J. Trump. Despite the mountains of gut wrenching drivel the man has espoused, and despite his lack of political experience, his inability to formulate syntactically correct sentences, and his clear lack of ethics, he has touched enough nerves, nerves left raw by perceived wrongs inflicted by a government seen as misguided and a society off course, that he has energize millions of Americans who now stand behind him. May we all look back on this period and throw up just a bit into our own mouths. Anyway… that’s populism for you.

Yes, it can bring about change and it can motivate people for good, bringing about the extension of suffrage and protection for the worker, but it can also lead to 2016.